Introduction

Efficiently managing GPU memory is crucial for optimizing performance in PyTorch, especially when working with large models and datasets. By leveraging techniques like data parallelism and model parallelism, you can distribute workloads across multiple GPUs, speeding up training and inference times. Additionally, practices such as using torch.no_grad(), emptying the CUDA cache, and utilizing 16-bit precision help to reduce memory overhead and prevent out-of-memory errors. In this article, we’ll walk you through the best practices for optimizing GPU memory and utilizing multi-GPU setups to boost your PyTorch performance.

Moving tensors around CPU / GPUs

Every tensor in PyTorch has a to() function that allows you to move the tensor to a specific device, like the CPU or a particular GPU. This function accepts a torch.device object as input, and you can initialize it with either of the following options:

• cpu for using the CPU,
• cuda:0 for putting the tensor on GPU number 0.

By default, when you create a tensor, it starts off on the CPU. But you can easily move it to the GPU by calling the to() function. To check if a GPU is available, you can use torch.cuda.is_available() , which gives you a true/false response based on whether CUDA-enabled GPUs are available.

Here’s an example:

if torch.cuda.is_available():
    dev = “cuda:0”
else:
    dev = “cpu”
device = torch.device(dev)
a = torch.zeros(4, 3) # Initialize a tensor of zeros
a = a.to(device)        # Move the tensor to the selected device (CPU or GPU)

Alternatively, you can specify the device directly by passing the device index to the to() function. This makes your code device-agnostic, meaning you don’t have to change anything if you switch between CPU and GPU. For instance:

a = a.to(0)        # Move tensor ‘a’ to GPU 0

cuda() function

Another way to transfer tensors to GPUs is using the cuda(n) function, where n specifies the index of the GPU. If you use cuda() without an argument, it will put the tensor on GPU 0 by default. You can also use the to() and cuda() methods provided by the torch.nn.Module class to move the entire neural network to a specific device. When using these methods on a neural network, you don’t need to assign the returned value; just call the function directly. For example:

clf = myNetwork()
clf.to(torch.device(“cuda:0”))        # Move the network to GPU 0
        # or
clf = clf.cuda()        # Equivalent to the previous line

Automatic selection of GPU

While it’s helpful to manually choose which GPU a tensor should go to, we often work with many tensors during operations. And we want these tensors to automatically be created on the right device to avoid unnecessary transfers between devices, which can slow things down. PyTorch gives us a way to automate this. One handy function is torch.get_device() . This function only works for GPU tensors, and it tells you the index of the GPU where the tensor currently resides. You can use this to figure out where a tensor is located and ensure any new tensor is created on the same device. Here’s an example:

a = t1.get_device()        # Get the device index of tensor ‘t1’
b = torch.tensor(a.shape).to(dev)        # Create tensor ‘b’ on the same device as ‘t1’

You can also use the cuda(n) function to create tensors directly on a specified device. By default, all tensors created with cuda() are placed on GPU 0, but you can change that with:

torch.cuda.set_device(0)        # Set the default GPU to 0
        # or
torch.cuda.set_device(1)        # Set the default GPU to 1, or any other number

If an operation involves two tensors on the same device, the resulting tensor will also be placed on that device. But if the tensors are on different devices, you’ll get an error. So, it’s crucial to make sure that all tensors involved in an operation are on the same device before you perform it.

new_* functions

In PyTorch version 1.0, a set of new_* functions were introduced to help create new tensors that share the same data type and device as the tensor they’re called on. For example:

ones = torch.ones((2,)) .cuda(0)        # Create a tensor of ones of size (2, ) on GPU 0
newOnes = ones.new_ones((3, 4))        # Create a new tensor of ones with shape (3, 4) on the same device as ‘ones’
randTensor = torch.randn(2, 4)        # Create a random tensor with shape (2, 4) on the same device as ‘ones’

These functions are great for keeping your tensors device-agnostic, especially when working with multiple GPUs or handling large datasets. There’s a detailed list of new_* functions in the PyTorch documentation, so if you want to dive deeper into the specifics of creating tensors and managing memory across devices, that’s a great resource to check out.

Read more about managing GPU memory and tensor placement in PyTorch PyTorch CUDA Documentation.

cuda() function

So, if you want to move tensors to GPUs in PyTorch, one easy way is by using the cuda(n) function. Here, n is the index of the GPU you want to move your tensor to. If you don’t provide an argument to cuda() , it’ll just default to GPU 0. This is super helpful if you have more than one GPU available for processing. It ensures that your tensor lands on the right GPU automatically.

Now, PyTorch doesn’t stop there. It also gives you the to() and cuda() methods, which you can use within the torch.nn.Module class to move your whole neural network (or model) to a specific device, like a GPU. The cool thing about the to() method is that when you use it on an nn.Module object, you don’t have to assign the returned value back to the object, because the method changes the model in place.

Let’s say you want to move your model, myNetwork() , to GPU 0. You’d do it like this:

clf = myNetwork()
clf.to(torch.device(“cuda:0”))  # Move the model to GPU 0

Or you could use the cuda() method instead, which is basically the same thing:

clf = clf.cuda()  # Equivalent to the previous line

This whole approach is great because it makes handling your model’s device placement super easy. You don’t have to manually move each tensor around when you’re dealing with big models or when you’re shifting the whole network to a GPU for training or inference. It just simplifies everything!

Read more about managing tensor operations across multiple GPUs and using the cuda() function in PyTorch PyTorch CUDA Documentation.

Automatic selection of GPU

So, here’s the thing: when you’re working with PyTorch , picking which GPU a tensor goes to can give you a lot of control and help you optimize your setup. But, if you’re dealing with large models or datasets, manually choosing which GPU to assign each tensor can get pretty exhausting and, honestly, not the most efficient way to go about it. That’s when it’s much better to let PyTorch handle things automatically for you. It makes sure your tensors are placed on the right device without you having to micromanage them, which means less work for you and a smoother process overall.

You see, PyTorch has some built-in functionality to automatically assign devices to tensors. A super useful function for this is torch.get_device() . It’s especially great for GPU tensors. When you use this function, it gives you the GPU index where the tensor is located, so you can not only figure out where a tensor is, but also move any new tensors to the right device without doing it manually.

Let’s look at an example to make this clearer:

# Ensuring t2 is on the same device as t1
a = t1.get_device()  # Get the device index of t1
b = torch.tensor(a.shape).to(dev)  # Automatically move tensor b to the same device as t1

Here, what’s happening is that a = t1.get_device() grabs the device index of tensor t1 , and then we create a new tensor b on the same device by using the .to() method. This means no more worrying about moving tensors around manually— PyTorch does the heavy lifting for you.

Another option you’ve got is the cuda(n) function, which can also help you control where your tensors get created. Normally, if you use cuda() , it’ll place your tensor on GPU 0. But if you want it to go somewhere else, you just need to tell PyTorch which GPU you want by passing the index number to cuda() . For example:

torch.cuda.set_device(0)  # Set the current device to GPU 0
# or alternatively
torch.cuda.set_device(1)  # Set the current device to GPU 1

The cool thing here is that if you perform an operation between two tensors on the same device, the resulting tensor will also end up on that same device. But—just a heads up—if the tensors are on different devices, you’ll get an error. PyTorch needs the tensors to be on the same device to operate correctly.

All of this is pretty handy, right? It makes memory management easier and keeps things running smoothly, especially in multi-GPU setups. Plus, it helps you avoid the hassle of manually managing devices, making sure everything stays where it’s supposed to and avoiding unnecessary data transfers between devices.

For more information on efficiently managing GPU usage and automatic selection, check out PyTorch CUDA Documentation.

new_* functions

In PyTorch, the new_* functions, introduced in version 1.0, are super handy when you need to create new tensors based on another tensor’s properties, like its data type and which device it’s placed on. These functions come in handy when you want your new tensors to match an existing tensor’s shape, device, and type—making things easier and ensuring consistency in your tensor operations across different devices.

Let’s take the new_ones() function as an example. This function creates a new tensor, filled with ones, while keeping the same data type and device as the tensor it’s called on. This is especially useful when you need to create tensors that should be compatible with others in terms of shape, device, and type. Here’s how you can use it:

ones = torch.ones((2,)).cuda(0)  # Create a tensor of ones of size (2,) on GPU 0
newOnes = ones.new_ones((3,4))  # Create a new tensor of ones of size (3,4) on the same device as “ones”

In this example, ones is a tensor of ones created on GPU 0. Then, by using new_ones() , we create newOnes , which is a new tensor of ones with a size of (3,4), and it lives on the same GPU (GPU 0) as the original ones tensor.

PyTorch also has other new_* functions like new_zeros() , new_full() , and new_empty() . These allow you to create tensors filled with zeros, a specific value, or uninitialized values—while making sure they’re placed on the same device as the tensor they’re based on. These functions are especially helpful in multi-device setups and when your tensors are involved in complex operations that need them to be on the same device.

For example:

randTensor = torch.randn(2,4)  # Create a tensor with random values of size (2,4)

These new_* functions are pretty powerful when it comes to avoiding mistakes in device placement and ensuring that your new tensors share the same properties as the original tensor. And if you want to dig deeper, there’s a detailed list of all the new_* functions in the PyTorch documentation.

For more details on efficient tensor management and initialization in PyTorch, visit the PyTorch Tensor Documentation.

Using Multiple GPUs

When you’re working with large models or datasets in PyTorch, using multiple GPUs can really speed things up. There are two main ways to use multiple GPUs: Data Parallelism and Model Parallelism.

Data Parallelism

Data Parallelism is probably the most common way to split up work across multiple GPUs in PyTorch. Basically, this method takes a big batch of data and splits it into smaller mini-batches, which are then processed at the same time on different GPUs. After each GPU works on its chunk, the results are gathered together and combined on one device—usually the device that originally held the data.

In PyTorch, you can implement Data Parallelism using the nn.DataParallel class. This class helps to manage splitting the data and processing it on multiple GPUs while keeping everything synced up. Here’s how you might use it:

parallel_net = nn.DataParallel(myNet, gpu_ids=[0, 1, 2])
predictions = parallel_net(inputs)  # Forward pass on multi-GPUs
loss = loss_function(predictions, labels)  # Compute the loss
loss.mean().backward()  # Average GPU losses + backward pass
optimizer.step()  # Update the model

In this example, myNet is the neural network you’re working with, and gpu_ids=[0, 1, 2] means the model will be spread out across GPUs 0, 1, and 2. After the forward pass, the predictions are computed in parallel on these GPUs, and the loss is calculated and sent back through the network.

But here’s the thing: Even though the data is split across multiple GPUs, it still needs to be loaded onto a single GPU to start with. You also need to make sure the DataParallel object is on that same GPU. Here’s how to handle that:

input = input.to(0)  # Move the input tensor to GPU 0
parallel_net = parallel_net.to(0)  # Make sure the DataParallel object is on GPU 0

This way, both the model and the data are on the same GPU for the initial processing. Essentially, the nn.DataParallel class works by breaking the input data into smaller chunks, copying the neural network to the available GPUs, doing the forward pass, and then collecting the results back on the original GPU.

Model Parallelism

Model Parallelism is another way to split up the workload across multiple GPUs. Unlike Data Parallelism, where the data gets split up and processed at the same time, Model Parallelism divides the model itself into smaller pieces, or subnetworks, and places each one on a different GPU. This approach works great when the model is too big to fit into the memory of a single GPU.

However, there’s a catch. Model Parallelism tends to be slower than Data Parallelism because the subnetworks are dependent on each other. This means each GPU has to wait for data from another GPU, which can slow things down. Still, the big win here is that you can train models that would be too large for just one GPU.

Here’s a diagram showing the basic idea:

[Subnet 1] —> [Subnet 2] (with wait times during forward and backward passes)

So yeah, while Model Parallelism might be a bit slower in terms of processing speed, it’s still a game changer when you need to work with models that are too large to fit on just one GPU.

Model Parallelism with Dependencies

Implementing Model Parallelism in PyTorch isn’t too complicated as long as you remember two important things:

• The input and the network need to be on the same device to avoid unnecessary device transfers.
• PyTorch’s to() and cuda() functions support autograd, so gradients can be passed between GPUs during the backward pass.

Here’s an example of how you can set up Model Parallelism in PyTorch with two subnetworks placed on different GPUs:

class model_parallel(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__()
        self.sub_network1 = …
        self.sub_network2 = …
        self.sub_network1.cuda(0)  # Place the first sub-network on GPU 0
        self.sub_network2.cuda(1)  # Place the second sub-network on GPU 1  </p>
<p>    def forward(self, x):
        x = x.cuda(0)  # Move input to GPU 0
        x = self.sub_network1(x)  # Process input through the first sub-network
        x = x.cuda(1)  # Transfer output to GPU 1
        x = self.sub_network2(x)  # Process input through the second sub-network
        return x

In this example, model_parallel defines two subnetworks: sub_network1 and sub_network2 . sub_network1 is placed on GPU 0, and sub_network2 is placed on GPU 1. During the forward pass, the input tensor is first moved to GPU 0, where it’s processed by sub_network1 . Then, the output is moved to GPU 1, where it’s processed by sub_network2 .

Since PyTorch’s autograd system is handling things, the gradients from sub_network2 will automatically be sent back to sub_network1 during the backward pass, making sure the model is trained properly across multiple GPUs. This approach lets you take full advantage of multiple GPUs, even if the model is too big to fit on one.

To learn more about optimizing multi-GPU workflows in deep learning, check out the PyTorch Distributed Data Parallel (DDP) Tutorial.

Data Parallelism

Data Parallelism in PyTorch is a great way to split up the work when you need to process a ton of data, especially if you’ve got a few GPUs lying around. The idea is to distribute the workload across multiple GPUs, which speeds up the whole process, especially when you’re dealing with big datasets. This technique is all about splitting your data into smaller chunks, running them in parallel across several GPUs, and then merging the results. It’s super handy for making the most of your GPU resources.

To use Data Parallelism in PyTorch, you set it up with the nn.DataParallel class. This class takes care of splitting your data and running the job on multiple GPUs. You just need to pass in your neural network ( nn.Module object) and a list of GPU IDs that the data will be split across. Here’s a simple example of how to get it going:

parallel_net = nn.DataParallel(myNet, gpu_ids=[0, 1, 2])

In this case, myNet is your neural network, and gpu_ids=[0, 1, 2] tells PyTorch to spread the workload across GPUs 0, 1, and 2. This way, your model can handle bigger batches of data, which speeds up training a lot.

Once you’ve got your DataParallel object set up, you can treat it just like a regular nn.Module object. For example, during the forward pass, you just call it like this:

predictions = parallel_net(inputs)  # Forward pass on multi-GPUs

Now, the model is processing input data across the GPUs. After that, you can compute the loss and do the backward pass like you normally would:

loss = loss_function(predictions, labels)  # Compute loss function
loss.mean().backward()  # Average GPU losses + backward pass
optimizer.step()  # Update the model

However, here’s something to keep in mind. Even though your data is split across multiple GPUs, it has to start on a single GPU. You also need to make sure the DataParallel object is on the correct GPU, just like you would with any regular nn.Module . Here’s how you make sure the model and input data are on the same device:

input = input.to(0)  # Move the input tensor to GPU 0
parallel_net = parallel_net.to(0)  # Ensure the DataParallel object is on GPU 0

This is super important to make sure everything syncs up properly when training. The nn.DataParallel class works by taking your input data, splitting it into smaller batches, making copies of your neural network on all the GPUs, doing the forward pass on each GPU, and then collecting everything back on the original GPU.

Here’s a quick overview of how it all works:

• [Input Data] → [Split into smaller batches] → [Replicate Network on GPUs] → [Forward pass on each GPU] → [Gather results on original GPU]

Now, one issue with Data Parallelism is that it can lead to one GPU doing more work than the others, which can mess with performance. This usually happens because the main GPU is the one collecting the results from all the other GPUs, making it take on more work.

To avoid this, you can use a couple of tricks:

• Compute the loss during the forward pass: This ensures that the loss calculation is parallelized too, so the workload gets distributed a bit more evenly across the GPUs.
• Implement a parallel loss function layer: This would spread the loss computation across the

  To explore more about leveraging Data Parallelism in deep learning, check out the PyTorch Data Parallelism Tutorial.

  Model Parallelism

  Model parallelism is a handy trick in deep learning, especially when your neural network is just too big for one GPU to handle. The idea is to split the network into smaller subnetworks and distribute them across multiple GPUs. This way, you can work with massive models that wouldn’t fit into a single GPU’s memory.

  But here’s the catch—model parallelism is usually slower than data parallelism. Why? Well, when you break up a single neural network and spread it across GPUs, the GPUs have to communicate with each other. During the forward pass, one subnetwork might have to wait for data from another, and during the backward pass, the gradients need to be shared between GPUs. These dependencies can slow things down because the GPUs aren’t running totally independently like they would in data parallelism. But even with the slowdowns, model parallelism is still a winner when your model is too big to fit into one GPU. It allows you to work with larger models that would otherwise be impossible.

  For example, imagine this: Subnet 2 has to wait for the output from Subnet 1 during the forward pass. Then, Subnet 1 has to wait for Subnet 2’s gradients during the backward pass. See how that can slow down the process? But that’s the price you pay for handling bigger models.

  Model Parallelism with Dependencies

  Implementing model parallelism in PyTorch is pretty straightforward, as long as you remember two key things:

  1. The input and the network need to be on the same device—this helps avoid unnecessary device transfers.
  2. PyTorch’s to() and cuda() functions support autograd, meaning gradients can be transferred between GPUs during the backward pass, helping backpropagate across devices.

  Now, let’s take a look at how to implement this in code:

  Copy

  
  class model_parallel(nn.Module):   def __init__(self):      super().__init__()      self.sub_network1 = …      self.sub_network2 = …      self.sub_network1.cuda(0)  # Move sub-network 1 to GPU 0      self.sub_network2.cuda(1)  # Move sub-network 2 to GPU 1</p>
  <p>   def forward(self, x):      x = x.cuda(0)  # Move input to GPU 0      x = self.sub_network1(x)  # Process input through sub-network 1      x = x.cuda(1)  # Move output of sub-network 1 to GPU 1      x = self.sub_network2(x)  # Process through sub-network 2      return x
  

  Here’s what’s happening:

  • In the __init__ method, we assign sub_network1 to GPU 0 and sub_network2 to GPU 1.
  • During the forward pass, the input first goes to GPU 0 to be processed by sub_network1 . Then, the output moves over to GPU 1, where it’s processed by sub_network2 .

  Now, the key part is that since cuda() supports autograd, when the backward pass happens, the gradients from sub_network2 will automatically flow back to sub_network1 . This means the data and gradients transfer seamlessly between GPUs, and everything stays in sync for backpropagation.

  This setup makes it possible to use multiple GPUs effectively even when you’ve got a model that’s too big for one GPU, and it keeps everything running smoothly across devices.

  To learn more about implementing Model Parallelism effectively in PyTorch, check out the PyTorch Advanced Tutorials.

  Troubleshooting Out of Memory Errors

  This section will guide you through diagnosing and fixing memory issues that might pop up when you’re working with deep learning tasks, especially when your network eats up more memory than it should. If you run out of memory, you might need to reduce your batch size, but there are other steps you can take to make sure you’re using memory efficiently without sacrificing performance.

  Tracking Memory Usage with GPUtil

  A great way to track GPU memory usage is by using the nvidia-smi command in the console. The thing is, this tool can only show you peak GPU usage and out-of-memory (OOM) errors happen so fast that it’s tough to figure out which part of your code is causing the issue. So, here’s the solution—use the Python package GPUtil for real-time monitoring of GPU memory usage. This way, you can pinpoint exactly where the memory overflow is happening in your code.

  To get started, just install GPUtil with pip by running this command:

  Copy

  
  $ pip install GPUtil
  

  Once it’s installed, tracking GPU usage with GPUtil is super easy. Just add this line of code in your script to check how much memory you’re using:

  Copy

  
  import GPUtil # Display GPU utilization
  GPUtil.showUtilization()
  

  You can add this line of code at different spots in your script to see how memory usage changes as your program runs. This will help you track down the part of the code that’s causing the GPU memory to overflow.

  Dealing with Memory Losses Using the del Keyword

  PyTorch comes with an aggressive garbage collector that automatically clears up memory when a variable goes out of scope. However, Python doesn’t have strict scoping rules like languages such as C or C++. Variables in Python stay in memory as long as there are still references to them, so even after you leave the training loop, memory used by tensors might not be freed up until all references are deleted.

  Here’s an example to show how this works:

  Copy

  
  for x in range(10):
      i = x
      print(i) # 9 will be printed
  

  After this loop, the variable i still exists in memory, even though the loop is finished. The same thing can happen with tensors that store loss or output data—they might stay in memory unless you explicitly delete them.

  To release memory occupied by such tensors, you should use the del keyword:

  Copy

  
  del out, loss # Clears references to tensors, making memory available for garbage collection
  

  As a general rule, if you’re done with a tensor, you should use del to delete it. PyTorch won’t automatically garbage collect a tensor unless there are no remaining references to it.

  Using Python Data Types Instead of 1-D Tensors

  In training loops, we often update values to track metrics. One common example is updating the running loss during each iteration. However, if you don’t handle this carefully in PyTorch, it can cause unnecessary memory usage.

  Consider this code snippet:

  Copy

  
  total_loss = 0
  for x in range(10):    # Assume loss is computed here
      iter_loss = torch.randn(3,4).mean()
      iter_loss.requires_grad = True  # losses are differentiable
      total_loss    += iter_loss    # use total_loss += iter_loss.item() instead
  

  Here, iter_loss is a tensor, and since it’s differentiable, each time we add it to total_loss , a new node is added to the computation graph. This means the graph keeps growing, causing memory consumption to increase as tensors aren’t freed between iterations.

  Normally, the memory allocated for a computation graph is released when backward() is called. But here, the graph isn’t freed because total_loss keeps holding references to iter_loss . To fix this, replace the tensor-based operation with a Python native data type using .item() :

  Copy

  
  total_loss += iter_loss.item()    # Use the Python data type (float) instead of the tensor
  

  This prevents the creation of a computation graph when updating total_loss , which helps you avoid unnecessary memory usage.

  Emptying CUDA Cache

  While PyTorch does a great job of managing GPU memory, it doesn’t always release memory back to the operating system (OS) after you delete your tensors. Instead, it caches the memory to speed up future tensor allocations. This caching can cause problems, especially if you’re running multiple processes. If one process finishes its task but still holds onto GPU memory, the next process might run into out-of-memory (OOM) errors when trying to use the GPU.

  To fix this, you can explicitly clear the cached memory using the following PyTorch command:

  Copy

  
  torch.cuda.empty_cache()    # Releases unused memory back to the OS
  

  Here’s how you can use this in practice:

  Copy

  
  import torch
  from GPUtil import showUtilization as gpu_usage
  print(“Initial GPU Usage:”)
  gpu_usage()
  tensorList = []
  for x in range(10):    # Adjust tensor size if you experience OOM
      tensorList.append(torch.randn(10000000, 10).cuda())
  print(“GPU Usage after allocating a bunch of Tensors:”)
  gpu_usage()
  del tensorList    # Delete the tensors
  print(“GPU Usage after deleting the Tensors:”)
  gpu_usage()
  print(“GPU Usage after emptying the cache:”)
  torch.cuda.empty_cache()
  gpu_usage()
  

  When you run this, it’ll display GPU usage at different stages. Here’s an example output from running this on a Tesla K80:

  Output

  
  Initial GPU Usage:
  ID  GPU  MEM
  0   0%  5%
  GPU Usage after allocating a bunch of Tensors:
  ID  GPU  MEM
  0   3%  30%
  GPU Usage after deleting the Tensors:
  ID  GPU  MEM
  0   3%  30%
  GPU Usage after emptying the cache:
  ID  GPU  MEM
  0   3%  5%
  

  As you can see, even after deleting the tensors, the memory doesn’t immediately get freed. But calling torch.cuda.empty_cache() releases the unused memory back to the OS. This is super useful when running multiple processes one after another, as it prevents OOM errors caused by leftover cached memory.

  For more detailed insights on troubleshooting out-of-memory errors in GPU-based workflows, visit the PyTorch CUDA Documentation.

  Tracking Memory Usage with GPUtil

  One effective way to keep an eye on GPU memory usage is by using the nvidia-smi command in the console. It gives you a snapshot of the GPU’s memory usage and other stats. But here’s the thing: this method can be tricky. The main issue is that GPU memory spikes and out-of-memory (OOM) errors tend to happen so fast, you might not be able to catch the specific part of your code causing the problem. So, it’s hard to directly link the memory overflow to a specific operation.

  To solve this problem, we can turn to a Python extension called GPUtil. This handy tool gives us a much clearer picture, allowing us to track GPU usage while the code is running. That way, we can pinpoint exactly where things go wrong and identify which section of the code is causing the memory issues.

  Getting GPUtil is easy—just run this pip command:

  Copy

  $ pip install GPUtil

  Once it’s installed, you can use it to monitor GPU memory usage like this:

  Copy

  import GPUtil  # Display GPU utilizationGPUtil.showUtilization()

  You can add this line to different spots in your code, and it’ll track how memory usage changes as your program runs. This gives you a clear view of how the memory is behaving and, more importantly, helps you figure out which part of the code is responsible for the memory overflow. It’s especially useful for debugging memory problems while you’re training or running models, as it isolates the exact function or operation that’s eating up too much memory.

  For a deeper dive into GPU memory monitoring tools, check out the NVIDIA System Management Interface (nvidia-smi) User Guide.

  Dealing with Memory Losses using del keyword

  PyTorch has this neat garbage collection system that’s pretty aggressive about freeing up memory. Once a variable goes out of scope, the garbage collector steps in and clears up the memory. But here’s the thing: Python’s garbage collection isn’t as strict as in languages like C or C++. In Python, a variable stays in memory as long as there are references (or pointers) to it. So, this can cause some issues, especially when you’re working with big datasets and tensors in your deep learning models.

  Now, what makes Python a bit tricky is that you don’t always have to explicitly declare variables. This means that memory used by tensors holding input or output data might not be freed, even when those variables are no longer needed. This usually shows up when you’re working in the training loop. Even though the loop finishes, those tensors might still hang around in memory because they’re still referenced.

  Here’s an example of what I mean:

  Copy

  
  for x in range(10):
      i = x
      print(i) # 9 is printed
  

  Even though the loop is done, the value of i still stays in memory because it’s still being referenced. In the same way, tensors that store loss values or output data from your training loop might stick around in memory, even when you don’t need them anymore. And when that happens, you could run into some serious memory leaks. This is especially problematic if you’re working with large models or have long-running processes. It can cause the GPU memory to get overloaded pretty quickly.

  So, how do you fix this? Well, this is where the del keyword comes in handy. Using del removes the reference to the variable, making sure Python’s garbage collector can swoop in and free up the memory. Here’s how you’d do it:

  Copy

  
  del out, loss # Deletes references to the tensors
  

  Using del tells Python, “Hey, we’re done with these tensors, so go ahead and get rid of them.” This makes sure the memory gets properly freed. As a general rule of thumb, when you’re done with a tensor and it’s no longer needed, hit it with del to make sure that memory gets cleared out. This is super important, especially in deep learning workflows, where large tensors can pile up fast and cause memory issues if not managed properly. Without using del , Python won’t collect the object until the reference count drops to zero—and that might not happen as quickly as you need.

  For additional insights on memory management and Python’s garbage collection, check out the Real Python article on memory management in Python.

  Using Python Data Types Instead of 1-D Tensors

  In deep learning, especially when you’re in the middle of training loops, you often need to aggregate values to track various metrics. A common example is updating the running loss after each iteration. But here’s the thing: in PyTorch, if you’re not careful about how you handle this aggregation, it can lead to unnecessary memory usage. This can slow down your training process and, even worse, lead to memory-related issues. This becomes even more important when you’re dealing with large models and datasets, where memory efficiency can make a big difference.

  So, let’s break it down with an example. Imagine you’re calculating the loss like this:

  Copy

  
  total_loss = 0
  for x in range(10):  # Assume loss is computed
      iter_loss = torch.randn(3, 4).mean()
      iter_loss.requires_grad = True  # Losses are supposed to be differentiable
      total_loss += iter_loss  # Use total_loss += iter_loss.item() instead
  

  In this example, iter_loss represents the loss value at each iteration. Since requires_grad is set to True, PyTorch keeps track of any operations involving iter_loss to compute gradients during backpropagation. Sounds great, right? But here’s the catch: when you add iter_loss to total_loss during each iteration, you’re expecting that the reference to the old iter_loss will be reassigned in the next iteration, and the memory from the previous tensor will be freed up. Unfortunately, that doesn’t always happen.

  So why does this happen? Well, since iter_loss is a differentiable tensor, when you add it to total_loss , PyTorch starts creating something called a computation graph, which includes an AddBackward node. Every time you add a new iter_loss , another AddBackward node is added to this graph. However, the memory holding the values of the previous iter_loss doesn’t get released. Essentially, the tensor’s history is kept alive because of that computation graph, which means the memory it uses isn’t freed.

  Normally, PyTorch frees up the memory used by the computation graph when the backward() function is called. But in this case, since we never call backward() on those intermediate iter_loss tensors, the memory they use just hangs around, leading to inefficient memory usage.

  How do we fix this? Well, the trick is to use a Python data type instead of a tensor when updating the total_loss variable. This way, you avoid creating extra computation nodes in the graph, and the memory gets freed up properly.

  Here’s the simple fix: Replace this line:

  Copy

  
  total_loss += iter_loss
  

  With this:

  Copy

  
  total_loss += iter_loss.item()
  

  What does .item() do? It converts the tensor into a plain Python number (like a float or an int, depending on the tensor’s type) and ensures that the addition doesn’t add anything to the computation graph. This way, you prevent creating unnecessary computation nodes, and memory occupied by iter_loss can be freed up properly.

  To learn more about memory-efficient operations in deep learning, refer to the PyTorch official documentation on memory formats.

  Emptying CUDA Cache

  While PyTorch does a great job managing memory, it doesn’t always immediately release memory back to the operating system (OS) after you delete your tensors. Why? Well, PyTorch uses a caching mechanism that keeps memory ready for future use, which helps avoid the extra hassle of asking the OS for more memory every time a new tensor is created. This is awesome for performance, but sometimes it can cause problems, especially when you’re working with multiple processes or running several jobs in a row.

  Here’s the thing: imagine you have multiple processes running, and after the first one finishes, it still holds onto the GPU memory. When you start the second process, you might run into out-of-memory (OOM) errors because the GPU memory that should have been freed is still occupied by the first process. This is even more of an issue when you’re juggling multiple models or experiments. The first process is done, but the GPU memory is still in use, and that can mess things up for the next job.

  To fix this and make sure the memory is properly freed between processes, you can use the

  Copy

  torch.cuda.empty_cache()

  function at the end of your code. This command tells PyTorch to clear out any cached memory that’s no longer needed, making it available for the next process or task.

  Let’s take a look at how you can use

  Copy

  torch.cuda.empty_cache()

  in practice:
  Copy

  
  import torch
  from GPUtil import showUtilization as gpu_usage  print(“Initial GPU Usage”)
  gpu_usage()  # Allocate memory by creating a list of tensors
  tensorList = []
  for x in range(10):
      tensorList.append(torch.randn(10000000, 10).cuda())  # Reduce the size of the tensor if you are getting OOM
  print(“GPU Usage after allocating a bunch of Tensors”)
  gpu_usage()  # Delete the tensors to release memory
  del tensorList
  print(“GPU Usage after deleting the Tensors”)
  gpu_usage()  # Empty the cache to ensure memory is released
  print(“GPU Usage after emptying the cache”)
  torch.cuda.empty_cache()
  gpu_usage()
  

  When you run this code on a Tesla K80, you’ll see how the GPU memory usage changes at different stages:

  Output

  
  Initial GPU Usage
  ID    GPU   MEM
  0     0%    5%GPU Usage after allocating a bunch of Tensors
  ID    GPU   MEM
  0     3%    30%GPU Usage after deleting the Tensors
  ID    GPU   MEM
  0     3%    30%GPU Usage after emptying the cache
  ID    GPU   MEM
  0     3%    5%
  

  In this output, you can see how the memory usage changes as tensors are allocated, deleted, and then cleared by the

  Copy

  torch.cuda.empty_cache()

  command. By calling
  Copy

  empty_cache()

  , you ensure that unused memory is rele

  For more information on efficient memory management and cache clearing in PyTorch, refer to the official PyTorch CUDA memory management guide.

  Using torch.no_grad() for Inference

  By default, PyTorch builds a computational graph during the forward pass of a neural network. This graph holds buffers to store gradients and intermediate values, which are needed to calculate the gradients during the backward pass. When the backward pass happens, most of these buffers get cleared, except for those used by the leaf variables (the parameters that need gradients). These buffers help with the smooth backpropagation of gradients while training.

  But here’s the thing—during inference (when you’re just evaluating the model and don’t need gradients), the backward pass doesn’t happen. Even though you’re not using gradients, those buffers for gradient calculation still stick around, taking up precious memory. Over time, this can result in unnecessary memory usage and might eventually trigger out-of-memory (OOM) errors, especially when you’re working with large batches or deep neural networks.

  So, what’s the fix? You’ll want to disable gradient tracking during inference. You can easily do this by wrapping your inference code inside a torch.no_grad() context manager. What this does is ensure that PyTorch doesn’t track operations on tensors, which reduces memory usage by not saving gradients for those operations. This is super useful when you’re only interested in the model’s output and not in the gradients (like when you’re evaluating or making predictions).

  Here’s a quick example of how to use torch.no_grad() to save memory during inference:

  Copy

  
  with torch.no_grad():
      # Your code for inference goes here
      predictions = model(inputs)
  

  By using this context manager, you’re making sure that all operations inside it don’t track gradients, which lowers memory usage and speeds up your inference process. This is key when you’re doing tasks like model evaluation, making predictions, or running inference across big datasets—especially when you’re dealing with large models or limited GPU memory.

  To sum it up, torch.no_grad() is a great tool for cutting down on memory overhead and making inference operations in PyTorch way more efficient. It stops you from collecti_

  For a deeper dive into optimizing PyTorch models for inference with efficient memory usage, check out the official PyTorch documentation on torch.no_grad().

  Using CuDNN Backend

  You can make your neural network models run faster and more efficiently by using the cuDNN benchmark, which is a high-performance GPU-accelerated library for deep neural networks, created by NVIDIA. If you’re training models with fixed input sizes, using cuDNN can really speed things up and help save memory. cuDNN is super optimized for operations like convolution, which are key to the performance of a lot of neural network models.

  By turning on the cuDNN benchmark, PyTorch can automatically tweak its algorithms to make the most of your GPU’s hardware setup. This means better efficiency when doing forward and backward passes, especially for operations like the convolutional layers in convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which often deal with fixed-size inputs. Without the benchmark, PyTorch might fall back on slower algorithms that aren’t as efficient.

  To turn on the cuDNN benchmark, all you need to do is add a couple of lines at the start of your code. This will make PyTorch use the optimized cuDNN backend wherever possible:

  Copy

  
  torch.backends.cudnn.benchmark = True
  torch.backends.cudnn.enabled = True
  

  By setting torch.backends.cudnn.benchmark = True , you’re telling PyTorch to use the cuDNN auto-tuner, which picks the best algorithm for your hardware and input sizes. This can speed up models with fixed or small variations in input size. The torch.backends.cudnn.enabled = True setting ensures that cuDNN is used for all operations it supports, making sure your model gets the most optimization for its computations.

  But here’s the thing: enabling the cuDNN benchmark works best when your input sizes stay fixed or change very little between batches. If your input sizes vary a lot, turning on the cuDNN benchmark might not help much and could even slow things down. So, it’s a good idea to test both with and without the cuDNN benchmark to figure out which setup works best for your specific model and use case.

  To sum it up, enabling the cuDNN backend can seriously boost your performance, especially for models with fixed input sizes. It lets PyTorch tap into NVIDIA’s highly optimized cuDNN library, which helps reduce memory usage and speeds up processing.

  For more details on optimizing your models using NVIDIA’s cuDNN backend in PyTorch, refer to the NVIDIA cuDNN documentation.

  Using 16-bit Floats

  The newer NVIDIA GPUs, like the RTX and Volta series, now support both 16-bit training and inference. This is a game-changer when you’re working with large models or aiming to optimize for speed and memory efficiency. By using 16-bit floating-point precision (also known as “half-precision”), you can reduce memory usage significantly and, in some cases, even speed up your training times.

  To convert your model and input tensors to 16-bit precision in PyTorch, you just need to use the .half() method. This method cuts down on the memory needed for your model, making it a lot more efficient—especially on GPUs that don’t have a ton of memory available. Here’s how you do it:

  Copy

  
  model = model.half()  # Convert the model to 16-bit precision
  input = input.half()  # Convert the input tensor to 16-bit precision
  

  Now, while the 16-bit precision trick can drastically reduce GPU memory usage—by almost 50%—you should be careful. There are a few potential issues, especially when using layers like batch normalization.

  Batch normalization can run into problems when trained with 16-bit precision. This happens because batch normalization calculates the mean and variance of activations, which can lose precision when using half-precision floats. To avoid this, you’ll want to make sure your batch normalization layers stay in 32-bit precision ( float32 ), even if the rest of your model is in 16-bit precision. Here’s how you can keep batch normalization in check:

  Copy

  
  # Convert the model to half precision
  model.half()  # Ensure batch normalization layers are in float32 precision
  for layer in model.modules():
      if isinstance(layer, nn.BatchNorm2d):
          layer.float()  # Keep batch normalization in float32
  

  Another thing to keep in mind is that when passing the output of one layer to the next during the forward pass, you need to make sure the data type transitions smoothly. Specifically, the input to the batch normalization layer should go from float16 to float32 , and once it’s passed through the layer, it should convert back to float16 . This keeps things precise during the most important parts of the calculation.

  You’ll also want to be cautious about potential overflow issues when using 16-bit floats. Since 16-bit floats have limited precision, certain operations—like working with large numbers or calculating the union of two bounding boxes for Intersection over Union (IoU)—might cause overflow errors. To avoid these issues, make sure the values you’re working with are within a reasonable range, as going too far can lead to inaccuracies.

  To help with all this, NVIDIA also released a PyTorch extension called Apex. Apex makes mixed-precision training safer and easier to implement, helping you use the benefits of 16-bit precision without running into stability or overflow problems. It also offers tools for automatic casting, so you can train your deep learning models with mixed precision without sacrificing performance or accuracy.

  So, while 16-bit precision can really help with memory usage and speed, it’s important to understand the limitations. By managing layers like batch normalization, ensuring correct type conversions, and using tools like Apex, you can fully leverage the power of 16-bit precision while avoiding potential pitfalls.

  For a deeper dive into 16-bit precision training and its implementation in PyTorch, refer to the official PyTorch documentation on half-precision training.

  Conclusion

  In conclusion, optimizing GPU memory in PyTorch is essential for maximizing performance, especially when working with large models and complex datasets. By using techniques like data parallelism and model parallelism, you can distribute workloads across multiple GPUs, speeding up both training and inference. Practices such as automating GPU selection, using torch.no_grad(), emptying the CUDA cache, and employing 16-bit precision will help prevent out-of-memory errors and improve memory efficiency. As the field of deep learning continues to evolve, staying up-to-date with the latest GPU optimization techniques will ensure that you can fully harness the power of PyTorch and continue to push the boundaries of model performance.For more on optimizing GPU memory in PyTorch, explore these strategies to enhance your training workflows and boost your deep learning capabilities.

  Optimize GPU Memory in PyTorch: Debugging Multi-GPU Issues